Are Europeans growing more intolerant of diversity? However, with far-right and anti-immigration parties expected to be among the big winners of the upcoming EU elections in May, are Europeans growing less tolerant? A growing set of reports — from organisations including the Council of Europethe European Network Against RacismDemos and Chatham House — have found that support is indeed growing for far right parties across the EU.
She believes the rise in support for far-right parties has less to do with rising xenophobia in Europe, and more to do with a desire to punish mainstream parties for their failures: Will my children have a proper education?
Can we put our kids through university? Will we be able to afford to stay in this house?
1 debate updates
Can we expect our parents to receive a proper healthcare when needed? These questions lapins nains suisse anti aging the legitimate fear and worry of European citizens about their future — a fear that far-right parties across Europe are profiting from. They are naming scapegoats, in the form of the other person that looks different, has a different background, speaks Swiss planet eye anti aging different language and believes in something else than we do: asylum seekers, refugees, immigrants.
He believes EU policies are to blame for increasing racism and xenophobia in Europe: What we see is that fairly extremist parties that were usually not a part of the normal political landscape are entering politics.
Swiss planet eye anti aging the contrary, they have created lots of problems. With the open borders and migration policies of the EU, they have sparked racism and xenophobia across Europe; and with the obviously catastrophic consequences of the euro they have turned the eurozone into the last remaining big economy in the world still in recession.
How Democracy Can Win Again Sep 14, Gergely Karácsony The democratic erosion and state capture in Hungary is symptomatic of deeper structural problems that are afflicting most democracies and even threatening the future of human civilization. Faced with such challenges, democrats must not allow themselves to succumb to fatalism or apathy. As a teenager, I persuaded my family to drive me to the Austrian border to see history in the making: the dismantling of the Iron Curtain, which allowed East German refugees to head for the West. Reading many new publications and attending rallies for newly established democratic political parties, I was swept up by the atmosphere of unbounded hope for our future.
Should there be a ban on extremist political parties? How would Morten Messerschmidt respond to his suggestion?
I think, first and foremost, it is not an EU issue. Free speech is an inherent part of our democratic values and these questions are up to the member states.
Support High-Quality Commentary
However, I think the limit should be set at the point where there is incitement or inspiration to carry out violence. Actually, when you look at countries with the most regulatory approach to this, for instance Sweden, Germany and Austria, these are the countries where you see the biggest growth of neo-Nazism… Stupid remarks are better fought out in the open fields than inside the court room. On this point, Wikström agrees with Messerschmidt, arguing that there are serious risks associated with excluding movements from political participation: One of the fundamental pillars of the EU is the right to freedom of assembly.
These parties are democratic movements and we must never label them as martyrs, because if they are not allowed to appear in public then they will appear in the darkness.
TERMÉKEK, AMIBEN MEGTALÁLHATÓ
Instead, we should question their agenda when it comes to education, research, politics, economic issues, social issues and cultural issues. Because they do not have an agenda in those fields, and when citizens realize that they are completely empty-handed then how can they ever be elected as legitimate MEPs or members of national parliaments?
What do YOU think? Is European society really becoming more intolerant and xenophobic? And, if so, what should be the response?
Vote Voting is closed in our Debating Europe Vote ! The results are now in, so come and see what our readers thought! Where does the limit lay when talking about hate speech and how tolerant we should be? And is it up to courts or national governments to address hate speech?
And where lays the limit between hate speech and freedom of expression?